Introduction
Intrapartum foetal distress and neonatal acidemia are closely linked conditions that lead to neonatal mortality. A WHO report states that 1.9 million stillbirths happen every year and intrapartum stillbirths contribute 40% to it.1 Hypoxia is believed to contribute to 90% of foetal deaths occurring during labour.2 It can have significant implications on the health of the newborn. Complications of foetal distress also include neonatal morbidity in the form of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions, birth asphyxia, respiratory distress, neurological damage, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, seizure disorder, developmental delays and cerebral palsy.3 This also leads to maternal morbidity in the form of caesarean section, as most of the intrapartum foetal distress cases are managed by emergency caesarean sections for immediate delivery and a better neonatal outcome.4 Recently, there has been a marked rise in the rate of caesarean deliveries across the globe. Foetal distress is the chief indication for primary emergency caesarean sections and the second most common indication for overall caesarean sections.5 In 2017, a report carried out at our tertiary care hospital revealed a caesarean section rate of 44.61%.5 Foetal distress was the second most common indication for overall caesarean deliveries, accounting for 16.24% after previous lower segment caesarean section (LSCS).5
Foetal distress is a vague term. In clinical practice, it is used to describe a wide range of foetal heart rate abnormalities that, if not corrected, will result in decompensation of physiological responses and cause permanent central nervous system damage or death.2 3 Electronic foetal monitoring is commonly used to detect foetal distress. In clinical practice, cardiotocography (CTG) based National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) classification is widely used for diagnosis of foetal distress such as category II and category III traces which include tachycardia, repetitive variable deceleration, late deceleration, and marked and decreased variability.6 It has been observed in previous research that irrespective of the type of decelerations, acidic pH and NICU admissions are seen.7 Acidic pH is often observed with variable and late deceleration.7 CTG is criticised for increased rates of caesarean deliveries for foetal distress as the false-positive rate of diagnosis of foetal distress with CTG is high (60%).8 Nevertheless, CTG is preferred as it is documented proof for the basis of intervention performed for managing cases of foetal distress. CTG interpretation needs technical training. Emphasis is given to avoid foetal acidemia, for late and persistent variable deceleration. It is observed that there is a knowledge gap in identifying a better CTG parameter that can be interpreted easily and aid in the early diagnosis of foetal distress so that a timely decision is taken for the prevention of neonatal acidemia. Total deceleration area (TDA), a simple formulated calculation, was first described by Cahill et al, which has shown promising effects for predicting acidemia.9 In recent research by Geva et al, increased TDA was positively associated with neonatal encephalopathy and with MRI changes in affected neonates.10 11 We intended to study TDA on intrapartum cardiotocogram which will predict neonatal acidemia at birth in the Indian population.